設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明 更新日期:2017-04-23 文章總數:177049 瀏覽:308501048(自2000.10.1起)
點選此處可回到首頁!
法律知識庫 課程講座 法律圖書 電子報中心 回首頁
  台灣法律網新訊




自命為繼承人之人於民法第1146條第二項之消滅時效完成後行使其抗辯權者,其與繼承權被侵害人之關係即與正當繼承人無異,被繼承人財產上之權利應認為繼承開始時已為該自命為繼承人之人所承受(最高法院106年度台上字第72號民事判決)
服貿的公民不服從與立院憲政運作問題看法
【免費訂閱 台灣法律網電子報】
「哭夭」與「哭爸」,都是台語罵人的話嗎?
推動台灣中立和平的省思
若債務人之責任財產已不足清償債務,竟對特定債權為全額清償,致害及其他債權受清償之金額時,債權人亦得聲請法院撤銷之(最高法院105年度臺上字第2382號民事判決)
公寓大廈在法律實務停車場(位)新問題?
最高法院召開106年度第4次刑事庭會議邀請專家學者談刑法沒收新制議題
臺灣高等法院106年度上易字第819號被告馬英九通訊保障及監察法等上訴案件合議庭成員新聞稿
八田與一斷頭之憾
在債權雙重讓與之場合,第二受讓人之讓與契約,並非受讓不存在之債權,而係經債權人處分現存在之他人(第一受讓人)債權,性質上乃無權處分(最高法院105年度臺上字第1834號民事判決)
家屬間公然侮辱在「可受公評與真實」與「生活體驗總體評價」的區別
父母繼承子女財產如何處理
【林蕙瑛專欄】未達到預期的「禮尚往來」之標準
鄧文聰違反保險法等罪准予具保停止羈押檢察官抗告案件新聞稿
臺灣雲林地方法院105年度重訴字6號新聞槁
司法審查自律與他律的對話!
師大附中學生關電源毀損成立告訴乃論罪嗎?
苟信託行為有害於委託人之債權人權利者,其信託財產嗣後雖因法院之拍賣而塗銷信託登記,惟仍應許該債權人行使撤銷權(最高法院103年度臺上字第1973號民事判決)
司法院106年第3次人事審議委員會決議
臺灣高等法院有關105年度侵上重訴字第1號被告張彥文殺人等案件之新聞稿
依然令人無限羞愧
台灣憲法在二岸局勢變怎樣?

 台灣法律網 > 法律知識庫 > 英美法 > 美國契約法(CONTRACTS)


Vogt v. Madden  / 劉育偉
Vogt v. Madden110 Idaho 6, 713 p.2d 442 Facts: The plaintiff and defendant had an oral sharecrop agreement for the year 1979, and they renewed the agreement for the year 1980.Under the agreement, certain expenses were borne by pl ......(詳全文) 2009-10-20 02:20:00
Spaulding v. Morse  / 劉育偉
Spaulding v. Morse322 Mass. 149, 76 N.E.2d 137 Facts: George and Ruth Morse were married in 1921. Ruth obtained a decree of divorce which made provision for the custody and support of two children in 1932. It was agreed that Geor ......(詳全文) 2009-10-19 02:20:00
Ragosta v. Wilder  / 劉育偉
Ragosta v. Wilder156 Vt. 390, 592 A.2d 367 Facts: In 1987, the plaintiff mailed the defendant a letter offering to purchase the property along with a check for$2,000 and began arrangements to obtain the necessary financing. Howe ......(詳全文) 2009-10-18 02:20:00
Raffles v. Wichelhaus  / 劉育偉
Raffles v. Wichelhaus2 Hurl. &C. 906 Facts: The plaintiff sold the cotton to the defendant. And the parties agreed to transit goods by ship, which called Peerless sailed in October. But the cotton was delivered by another and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-17 02:20:00
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc.  / 劉育偉
Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services(NJ), Inc. 416 Mass. 684, 624 N.E.2d 959. Facts: The defendant operated a waste disposal facility to dispose of hazardous waste material and the plaintiffs(Polaroid Co. and Hooke ......(詳全文) 2009-10-16 02:20:00
Phillips v. Moor  / 劉育偉
Phillips v. Moor71 Me. 78. Facts: It was a negotiation by letter that the purchase of the hay in plaintiff’s barn had pressed by the defendant and it was a written invitation to the defendant to make an offer about the hay. ......(詳全文) 2009-10-15 02:20:00
Payen v. Cave  / 劉育偉
Payen v. Cave3 Term R. 148 Facts: The plaintiff sold a certain machine by auction under usual conditions that the high bidder should be the purchaser. The defendant bid the highest bid price 40 pounds but the auctioneer dwelt and ......(詳全文) 2009-10-14 02:20:00
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos  / 劉育偉
Nursing Care Services, Inc. v. Dobos380 So.2d 516. Facts: The defendant, a patient, had suffered serious disease to cause her doctor to order nursing care for her, and the hospital implemented this order by calling upon the plain ......(詳全文) 2009-10-13 02:20:00
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino  / 劉育偉
MCC-Marble Ceramic Center,Inc. v. Ceramica Nuova D’Agostino144 F.3d 1384 Facts: The plaintiff is the retailer of tiles and the defendant is the manufacturer of tiles. The parties arrived at an oral agreement on the sale of ......(詳全文) 2009-10-12 02:20:00
Lucy v. Zehmer  / 劉育偉
Lucy v. Zehmer196 Va. 493, 84 S.E.2d 516 Facts: Defendant wrote a note to the plaintiff, which stated that the defendant is selling their farm to the plaintiff for $50,000.  The plaintiff put the note in his pocket and offer ......(詳全文) 2009-10-11 02:20:00
Lonergan v. Scolnick  / 劉育偉
Lonergan v. Scolnick129 Cal.App.2d 179,276 P.2d 8. Facts: Defendant placed an ad for sale his land. The defendant sent a letter to plaintiff to ask his intention on March 26. On April 8, the defendant sent another letter which wa ......(詳全文) 2009-10-10 02:20:00
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc  / 劉育偉
Lefkowitz v. Greater Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc 251 Minn. 188, N.W.2d 689 Facts: The plaintiff read the ads in the newspaper for certain furs on sale on a first come first serve. The plaintiff followed and was the first ......(詳全文) 2009-10-09 02:20:00
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.  / 劉育偉
Lawson v. Martin Timber Co.238 La. 467,115 So.2d 821 Facts: The plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement which provided that the defendant had two years to cut and remove timber from plaintiff’s land, and that ......(詳全文) 2009-10-08 02:20:00
Klockner v. Green  / 劉育偉
Klockner v. Green254 A.2d 782 Facts: Plaintiffs were the stepson and stepgranddaughter of the decedent and defendants were the executor of the estate, the surviving next of kin of decedent, and a legatee under decedent’s la ......(詳全文) 2009-10-07 02:20:00
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.  / 劉育偉
International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice& Light Co.277 S.W. 631. Facts: Plaintiff is a manufacturer of machinery for the purification of water in connection with the manufacture of ice in Chicago and defendant is engaged i ......(詳全文) 2009-10-06 02:20:00

 [1]  2
 
免 費 電 子 報
發刊期數: 3719
律 師 的 叮 嚀

法院所為突襲性裁判,敗者不服,勝者僥倖,司法威信,因此蕩然無存,可不慎乎!

劉孟錦律師


主持律師:台灣聯合法律事務所 劉孟錦律師
地址:106 台北市大安區羅斯福路二段91號13樓(台北捷運【古亭站】3號出口) 預約律師
電話:(02)2363-5003 (代表號)  傳真:(02)2363-5009  E-mail:Lawyer885885@gmail.com
設成首頁 | 加入最愛 | 新訊連結 | 聯絡律師 | 推薦朋友 | 線上投稿 | 網站合作 | 律師簡介 | 律師諮詢 | Facebook | 隱私權聲明
法律具時效性,內容僅供參考,不宜直接引為訴訟用途,具體個案仍請洽詢專業律師
所有文章係作者之智慧,請尊重智慧財產權,轉載重製節錄請先取得本網之書面同意